Links
|
January 03, 2004Oh the linkage!The power of the internet is forged with hyperlinks. Google capitalized on it but now it's the bloggers time, time for the direction of traffic to be based on premeditated linking. As more and more people link to an article or site aggregator sites (like Daypop and Blogdex) pick up that multiple people are linking to the same thing and bubble up that article. This creates a sort of chain reaction once it reaches a critical mass - and then a meme is started and everyone (at least us news fiends and bloggers) soon knows about it. Why is it important to link to things you agree with? Because if you agree with it, then you value that person perception, and theoretically you would like others to agree with you as well. The power of linkage the power of the internet. Why am I going on about linkage? Well I read an interesting article on WiredOpinion.com about calls for someone to critique a Glenn Reynolds’s recent post on U.S. foreign policy regarding Palestinians. Instapundit is a powerful soap box and when he writes people listen and believe him. Jonathan has written excellent critique of Glenn's rather short sited and irrational 'call to arms'. If other people link to Jonathans piece then maybe it will reach the critical mass I was talking about earlier and come to the attention of Instapundit. It requires a communal effort but it's often worth it, especially with matters of profound importance like people's perception of the Palestinian people. While I'm at the linking game I may as well direct your attention to C. C. Keiser, yet another goodie found on my 21 grams thread. This fellow has some interesting views on something he calls Poly-Solipsism which I agree with pretty strongly. It's interesting when people can reach the same conclusions - does that validate them or just exemplify universal insanity? Who knows. Posted by ChefQuix at January 3, 2004 12:30 AM | TrackBackComments
Thanks for the compliments and the link, Chef. It might be a bit more effective if you linked to the post itself (URL: http://www.wiredopinion.com/movabletype/jonathan/archives/week_2003_12_28.html#000331). That will give me a "Trackback" ping and it will allow the link to filter through the Blogosphere with ease. Thanks again. I hope some other people read it.
Oh, never mind . . . you did link straight to the article. Hmm...I wonder why I didn't get a trackback... Posted by: Jonathan at January 3, 2004 10:00 PMI would say "Universal Insanity" is what we have now. I thank you for the link, and I have returned in kind. Chuck Posted by: cckeiser at January 3, 2004 10:52 PMI guess the problem is that it's not quite universal then, eh? Maybe if more people went nuts the world would work a whole hell of a lot better. It kind of reminds me of ants. Posted by: ChefQuix at January 4, 2004 04:39 AMNo, not 'nuts' or crazy, just Insane! 'O) "Ants"? My buddy Wally once told me that if you put 10 ants in ant colony they'd scratch out a living well enough, a 100 would start to get a little less survival rate, a 1000 would be completely disorganized to the point where the colony almost dies because the ants keep running into each other, but if you put 10,000 ants in an ant colony it would be so chaotic, so turbulent from all the collisions that it would find order and become an efficient successful ant colony. Posted by: ChefQuix at January 6, 2004 01:13 PMPost a comment
|